Patrick Fraser, Nuriya Nurgalieva & LdR, Fitch’s knowability axioms are incompatible with quantum theory, arXiv:2009.00321 (2020).

Carlo Sparaciari, LdR, Carlo Maria Scandolo, Philippe Faist & Jonathan Oppenheim, The first law of general quantum resource theories, Quantum 4, 259 (2020).

Raban Iten, Tony Metger, Henrik Wilming, LdR & Renato Renner, Discovering physical concepts with neural networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 010508 (2020).

Matthew F. Pusey, LdR & Bettina Meyer, Contextuality without access to a tomographically complete set, arXiv:1904.08699 (2019).

V. Vilasini, Nuriya Nurgalieva & LdR, Multi-agent paradoxes beyond quantum theory, New J. Phys. 21, 113028 (2019).

Nuriya Nurgalieva & LdR, Inadequacy of modal logic in quantum settings, Proceedings of QPL 2018, EPTCS 287,  pp. 267-297 (2019).

V. Vilasini, Christopher Portmann & LdR, Composable security in relativistic quantum cryptography, New J. Phys. 21, 043057 (2019).

Lea Krämer & Lidia del Rio, Operational locality in global theories, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 2018 376 20170321 (2018).

Lea Krämer & LdR, Currencies in resource theories, arXiv:1605.01064  (2016).

John Goold, Marcus Huber, Arnau Riera, LdR & Paul Skrzypczy,   The role of quantum information in thermodynamics — a topical review, J. Phys. A 49, 14  (2016).

LdR, Lea Krämer & Renato Renner, Resource theories of knowledge, arXiv:1511.08818 (2015).

LdR, Adrian Hutter, Renato Renner & Stephanie Wehner, Relative thermalization, arXiv:1401.7997 (2014).

LdR, Johan Åberg, Renato Renner, Oscar Dahlsten  & Vlatko Vedral, The thermodynamic meaning of negative entropy, Nature 474, 61–63 (2011).

Ricardo G. Dias, LdR & Alexander V. Goltsev, Interplay between potential and spin-flip scattering in systems with depleted density of states, Phys. Rev. B 86, 235120 (2012).

[updated list on the arXiv and on Google Scholar, some talks on PIRSA]

Guidelines to self: keep your assumptions light and explicit. If you have the tools to make single-shot statements, don’t start by proving average results. If you can state your settings without relying on concepts like probability, time, dimension, or a particular underlying theory like quantum mechanics, do so. This does not mean that you cannot use familiar quantum terms to express your concepts, but it should be clear when it is being used as a language, when it is an example, and when you are actually depending on the laws and structure of quantum theory. Results are subjective and relative to something until proven otherwise, so if you can make all players, perspectives and systems of interest explicit, don’t leave them implicit. If you are representing any sort of Bell scenario, remember that a and b come before x and y in the alphabet, and keep the former as inputs and the latter as outputs. Think about it.